Stop Making Excuses

How often have you heard:  “I didn’t know I couldn’t park there.  I’m so sorry.”  I’m willing to bet you hear it more than once a week if you have a disability and use accessible parking.

Not only do people not seem to recognize the meaning of the little blue sign with the international symbol for accessibility but they also seem to suddenly not know that the diagonal lines in the access aisle mean no parking.  So, let’s review the use of diagonal lines in all areas.

Diagonal lines in front of a fire hydrant mean:  No Parking.

Diagonal lines in and near a crosswalk mean:  No Parking.

Diagonal lines in a fire lane mean:  No Parking.

Diagonal lines near a corner mean:  No Parking.

Diagonal lines between accessible parking spaces mean:  No Parking.

See?  There is consistency.  In every single case, diagonal lines mean No Parking.  So, how can a person claim to not know the meaning of the lines when they are in the access aisles of accessible parking?  Seriously, if they don’t know, they should have their license suspended until they go to driving school for a refresher.  Or, are they just making an excuse?

That’s one of the main reasons I no longer accept their apologies.  They don’t mean anything.   They are not sorry that I had to sit out in the rain for an hour and miss an important appointment because they were too lazy to walk a few steps. It’s just another way of trying to say they thought they could get away with it and they are sorry they got caught. 

It seems that people pick and choose which laws they will obey.  Most of the time, accessible parking and anything under the Americans with Disabilities Act fall on the side of laws that won’t be obeyed.  Sadly, they also fall on the side of laws that are rarely enforced.

If someone parks in a fire lane, a parking ticket will be issued.  If someone parks in a crosswalk, a parking ticket will be issued.  If someone parks in the access aisle – with the same diagonal lines – it becomes “a teachable moment”.  Frankly, I feel I have been the teacher for far too many teachable moments.  Graduate them or fail them, but stop asking me to allow this to happen again and again and again, etc.

If accessibility laws were enforced across the board, I sincerely believe they would have the effect they were meant to have – to level the playing field so that persons with disabilities can live, go about their business, recreate and otherwise live full and independent lives. 

These laws have been in effect long enough for people to know about them unless they have been living under a rock.  Who really doesn’t know about parking under the little blue sign?  Who really doesn’t know what the diagonal lines mean?  Who really doesn’t know that the Americans with Disabilities Act exists for the purpose of allowing persons with disabilities to live full and productive lives on an equal basis with other citizens? 

Stop saying you’re sorry when you really mean you don’t care.  I know you will do it again first chance you get.  And this sorry state of affairs will continue until the laws are enforced and you feel the pinch. 

Police please take notice.  

We Need Another Martin Luther King Jr.

This week, we’ve been celebrating Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday.  He was a committed advocate and leader and his work greatly advanced the Civil Rights Movement.  In my never-to-be-considered-humble opinion, his greatest strength was the ability to mobilize so many to peacefully support the rights of all to live as fully integrated citizens of this country. 

I would love to see such a leader support the rights of persons with disabilities.  We are so very far behind when it comes to civil rights.

Persons with disabilities are black, white, brown, male, female, transgendered, gay, straight, rich, poor, young, old, Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, atheist, and speak every language that exists on this planet.  We are part of every segment of society.  There are even some who refer to those without disabilities as temporarily able, since we have an open enrollment all year long.  While some are born with a disability, membership in this society is not closed at birth.  An illness or accident can open the door to anyone at any time.  All told, persons with disabilities, both visible and not visible, comprise approximately 20% of the population.

We have the federal Americans with Disabilities Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act Amendments Act of 2008, but we don’t have the strong leader needed to support our taking our rightful place in society. 

I can hear some of the arguments against our achieving this goal now: 

·      It’s too expensive.

·         What do those people want now?  They’re out of institutions and nursing homes.  What more could they want?
·         We support (or help) the handicapped.  (How many insults can you see in such a short sentence?)
·         And more.

Perceptions and expectations are big barriers to full inclusion into society.  We are acceptable if we are a charitable cause.  But, there are many who do not imagine we can be customers, employees, employers, colleagues, etc.  One question that was posed to me during a training has stuck with me as an example of this:  We are a healthcare facility, what could we hire people with disabilities to do here?  While this was a healthcare facility, this question shows the doubt that we face every single day.

We need a national leader of the caliber of Martin Luther King Jr. to change this perception, show our abilities in as strong a light as our disabilities, and lead us to the place that we have a right to be as fully integrated members of society.

Any volunteers?

To Be Treated As Equal, Take Equal Responsibility

We recently celebrated the 25^th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act.  The Governor’s Commission on Disabilities organized an informal celebration where persons with disabilities, advocates and agencies that support our efforts could mingle and talk about the progress or lack of progress resulting from the ADA.

The celebration was held at the Eisenhower House in Fort Adams State Park.  This location was selected because it had recently been made accessible with a grant from the Governor’s Commission on Disabilities.

In order to complete this story, it’s important to know that public transportation in Rhode Island leaves a lot to be desired.  Since public bus routes are limited, paratransit operations which run within three-quarters of a mile from fixed bus routes are also limited.  So, that particular option, either public transport or paratransit, were not on the list of available options.

The celebration was pretty well attended so it was a surprise to later hear so much mumbling, grumbling and outright complaining about the perceived inaccessibility of an event to celebrate the ADA.

I am all about supporting the rights of persons with disabilities to have opportunities equal to those of our counterparts in the able-bodied world, but I have to admit I was miffed about this criticism.  A number of people did attend, including people in wheelchairs, so where did this fall apart?

The average person, when faced with a transportation barrier, will start calling friends (“Are you going?  How are you getting there?’), looking to carpool or share rides.  Alternatively, more telephone calls and using the internet can help locate alternative means of getting from point A to point B.  There were a number of alternatives that would have gotten people with or without disabilities to the Eisenhower House, some of them really fun.

Besides finding someone who was driving and offering to help pay gas or tolls, the possibility of putting together three or four people and renting a town car could work.  In a state the size of Rhode Island, four people sharing a town car can be quite affordable.  Another alternative would be to take the public transportation or paratransit to the Gateway Center and take a cab from there.  There are accessible taxis in Newport and they do not require reservations.  Even more fun, and probably more affordable, would be to get to the Gateway Center and take Old Port Marine’s accessible launch across the harbor to Fort Adams.  I sometimes take this launch to avoid driving and dealing with traffic.  Sometimes I take it just because it is a fun way to get there.  A similar option would be to just get to Jamestown and take the Jamestown Ferry from there. 

So, persons with disabilities, if you want equal rights – and it’s good to fight for them – you need to take equal responsibility for yourself.  Don’t limit yourself to one option and complain because it doesn’t work.  You’ll have a lot more fun and a much better life by taking some initiative.  Focus more on what you want to do than on the limits.  I know this because I’m there with you.

Excuses for Lack of Access

People don’t always recognize how inaccessible their businesses can be and how that discriminates against persons with disabilities. I know they don’t understand when they give excuses that don’t make sense.  Some of these excuses make me laugh until it hurts and others just make me shake my head.   Here are some examples:

During a survey of business owners, the question of accessibility was posed.  One business owner actually said that his business was accessible since the building only had one step to get into it!  Talk about no clue.  For someone in a wheelchair, that one step was as good as a steep cliff.  Access is denied. 

Another business owner said he wasn’t concerned since no one had come in to say he couldn’t get in.  Yes, that’s right.  (Read it again if you don’t get it.)  He somehow felt that if people could not get into the building, they would come in and tell him.  How?  Do people even think about what they say?

Another interesting response from a business owner was that he was not required to be accessible since he never said he was accessible.  How about if we apply that to other laws?  Suppose a policeman stops you for speeding.  Do you think that excuse would fly?  Try telling the officer that you were not required to obey speed limits since you never said you would.  While the officer may have difficulty writing that ticket at first because he would be laughing so hard, you can be sure there would be a ticket with a fine attached.  The same goes for any other law you break.  This is not a response that will benefit you.

When I recently complained to a business owner that I couldn’t attend several events that were held at his facility, he replied that two out of three of their facilities were accessible.  He then invited me to visit the accessible ones.  Somehow the fact that two facilities are accessible does not help when the event is at the inaccessible one got lost on the business owner.  Access to the events I was trying to attend was denied. 

When you fail to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, you are effectively putting up a “Keep Out” sign.  Actually, a sign can be ignored when the barrier cannot be.  Is keeping people out of your business what you really want to do?  Persons with disabilities make up the third largest market segment in the U.S.  I think that’s a lot of business to turn away.

Annette Bourbonniere

www.accessing-ability.com

Twitter:  @AccessInclude

Federal judge rules in favor of more accessible taxis

Hurray!  Advocates for persons with disabilities have been fighting with the city of New York regarding accessible taxis.  Now, a federal judge has ruled in their favor.  http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/24/nyregion/taxi-fleet-in-new-york-is-inadequate-for-wheelchair-users-judge-rules.html

The resistance on the part of the city and its Mayor, Michael Bloomberg, has been both puzzling and annoying.  With the population of persons with disabilities growing, and a new fleet of taxis being commissioned, the city administration, led by Mayor Bloomberg, fought against making the new taxis accessible.  The new taxis were to have all sorts of amenities, including televisions, but it was deemed that they should not be accessible.

Advocates did not give up the fight and this decision was recently handed down.  Additionally, Governor Cuomo signed a bill that asks for a plan for more taxis to be accessible. 

Persons with disabilities comprise the third largest market segment in the United States.  Additionally, accommodations for persons with disabilities are frequently adopted by the general population as innovations.  So, it’s time to retire the argument regarding costs.  It’s an investment, people!

Annette Bourbonniere

www.accessing-ability.com

Twitter:  @AccessInclude

Reviewing the System Is Only Part of the Answer

Reviewing the system for awarding disability benefits is necessary but it will not solve the real problem.http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204844504577098810070396878.html?mod=rss_Health

It is true that the trust fund for Social Security Disability benefits is running out of money and will not survive another decade.  It is important that this system get reviewed.  However, just reviewing this aspect of the system will not even come close to resolving the issues both the government systems and persons with disabilities face.

One problem we have is that we keep trying to fix pieces of the system.  Our disability policy has more Band-Aids than substance at this time.  But, it appears that we will keep on adding more.  It is a system that is based on the fact that, in the past, persons with disabilities were totally incapable of substantial gainful employment and were likely to die in a few short years.  That is no longer true, but the policy has not changed.

If we had a disability policy and system that reflected today’s reality, we could save the government a great deal of money and, at the same time, make life better for persons with disabilities. 

As things stand now, most people who receive disability benefits live in poverty and are forced to remain in that state in order to receive critical services.  At the same time, persons with disabilities are viewed as lazy (just check the comments at the end of the article) and unwilling to work.  This perception is perpetuated by the lawyers who advertise that people are entitled to these benefits, as though a life of poverty were something to strive for.

It is really time to look at the big picture.

Annette Bourbonniere

www.accessing-ability.com

Twitter:  @AccessInclude

Are Charter Schools Discriminating Against Persons with Disabilities?

Charter schools in Florida and elsewhere are not admitting students with disabilities.  http://www.npr.org/2011/12/14/143659449/florida-charter-schools-failing-disabled-students.

While they claim they do not turn away students because of their disabilities, they do say they are not equipped to meet their needs.  Of course, then, one has to ask why they are not so equipped.  They are publicly supported.  Of course, not every public school is equipped for every student either, but students are more likely to have their needs met at most public schools. 

Part of the problem is that students with disabilities most often have Individualized Education Plans (IEP’s) and those IEP’s will not send a child to a school that cannot meet their needs. 

Some charter schools specialize in children with disabilities, but that is just another form of segregation and, unless it is really impossible to meet the needs of these students elsewhere, special schools are a giant step backwards. 

How widespread is this problem?  What are the solutions?

Annette Bourbonniere

www.accessing-ability.com

access-ability.verizon.net

Twitter:  @AccessInclude