Raising Expectations Through Sports

Sports have often led the way to elevating the expectations of persons with disabilities and two recent events continued to validate that leadership:  The Clagett Regatta and the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee.

The Clagett Regatta, the premier regatta for persons with disabilities in North America, was held in Newport, RI, its home base, June 18 to June 23, 2019.   Since its inception, this regatta has provided sailors with disabilities the opportunity to compete on an elite level with other sailors around the U.S. and the world.  Many of the Clagett sailors gain the skills and confidence to compete in national and international events not identified as being adaptive.  Sailing is a great equalizer.  This year, the results were published in a story in Scuttlebutt Sailing News, a daily electronic newsletter about all things sailing in North America.  A great example of inclusivity!

On June 20, 2019, the U.S. Olympic Committee and the U.S. Paralympic Committee confirmed their merger with the name change to U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee (USOPC).  The commitment to this change began nearly a year ago and the merger includes raising the awards for Paralympic medalists to the same level as that for Olympic medalists.  The USOPC is the first organization in the world that includes both Olympic and Paralympic in its name and one of only four national organizations in the world to manage both Olympic and Paralympic sports.

Paralympic sports don’t get the same television and news coverage in the US as other Olympic sports or as Paralympic sports do in other countries.  Their inclusion in the USOPC and their parity in awards should lead to more awareness of this level of sport and this writer hopes that leads to more and better coverage.  If anyone has ever seen Paralympic competition, wheelchair tennis or regattas in adaptive boats, they know that the level of athleticism and intensity of competition is worthy of attention.

If the expectation of persons with disabilities can be raised in sports, that raise should be translatable to employment and accessibility as well.  That would bring parity to persons with disabilities in all areas of life.  What a great idea!

Federal judge rules in favor of more accessible taxis

Hurray!  Advocates for persons with disabilities have been fighting with the city of New York regarding accessible taxis.  Now, a federal judge has ruled in their favor.  http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/24/nyregion/taxi-fleet-in-new-york-is-inadequate-for-wheelchair-users-judge-rules.html

The resistance on the part of the city and its Mayor, Michael Bloomberg, has been both puzzling and annoying.  With the population of persons with disabilities growing, and a new fleet of taxis being commissioned, the city administration, led by Mayor Bloomberg, fought against making the new taxis accessible.  The new taxis were to have all sorts of amenities, including televisions, but it was deemed that they should not be accessible.

Advocates did not give up the fight and this decision was recently handed down.  Additionally, Governor Cuomo signed a bill that asks for a plan for more taxis to be accessible. 

Persons with disabilities comprise the third largest market segment in the United States.  Additionally, accommodations for persons with disabilities are frequently adopted by the general population as innovations.  So, it’s time to retire the argument regarding costs.  It’s an investment, people!

Annette Bourbonniere

www.accessing-ability.com

Twitter:  @AccessInclude

Reviewing the System Is Only Part of the Answer

Reviewing the system for awarding disability benefits is necessary but it will not solve the real problem.http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204844504577098810070396878.html?mod=rss_Health

It is true that the trust fund for Social Security Disability benefits is running out of money and will not survive another decade.  It is important that this system get reviewed.  However, just reviewing this aspect of the system will not even come close to resolving the issues both the government systems and persons with disabilities face.

One problem we have is that we keep trying to fix pieces of the system.  Our disability policy has more Band-Aids than substance at this time.  But, it appears that we will keep on adding more.  It is a system that is based on the fact that, in the past, persons with disabilities were totally incapable of substantial gainful employment and were likely to die in a few short years.  That is no longer true, but the policy has not changed.

If we had a disability policy and system that reflected today’s reality, we could save the government a great deal of money and, at the same time, make life better for persons with disabilities. 

As things stand now, most people who receive disability benefits live in poverty and are forced to remain in that state in order to receive critical services.  At the same time, persons with disabilities are viewed as lazy (just check the comments at the end of the article) and unwilling to work.  This perception is perpetuated by the lawyers who advertise that people are entitled to these benefits, as though a life of poverty were something to strive for.

It is really time to look at the big picture.

Annette Bourbonniere

www.accessing-ability.com

Twitter:  @AccessInclude

Placing Blame Doesn't Work

Don’t you just love it when you find out that gaining your own civil rights puts everyone else’s in jeopardy?  The if-we-give-you-this-it-will-ruin-it-for-everyone-else attitude is alive and well.

I cannot count how many times this excuse is given when dealing with access issues.  How many times do we get told that, if accommodations are provided, the costs will be so high that everyone else will suffer?

A recent example is in New York City, where there is a civil suit filed by the U.S. Attorney’s office against the city because of the lack of accessible taxis.   Mayor Bloomberg claims that the suspension of accessible taxis is bad so other riders will be uncomfortable.  Shame on us for making others uncomfortable so that we can be included.

Another claim that the mayor has made is that it will raise costs because of the cost of the modifications and the increased gas costs.  There we go again, making costs higher for everyone else.  He insists that the drivers won’t like them because the larger size makes it more difficult for the driver to communicate with the rider, leading to lower tips.  We really kill the economy with that one. 

Bloomberg also stated that it is too difficult for wheelchair users to hail taxis and that drivers don’t want to pick them up.  Well, it’s good to know that he’s looking out for us.  Right.

If were not enough, Governor Cuomo also got on the bandwagon, stating that having accessible taxis could jeopardize allowing street hails in the burroughs and upper Manhattan. 

So, it’s really clear that we wheelchair users are a royal pain and will cause the collapse of the New York transportation system. 

Their solution is that residents use designated transportation.  Of course, that will not work for tourists visiting New York.  Separate but equal?  Go to the back of the bus?  Does anyone recognize this rhetoric as blatant discrimination? 

It’s time for people to recognize that persons with disabilities are real people, living real lives, contributing to the economy like everyone else.  This is not charity or compassion, but thinking like a smart businessperson.  Include us and you will benefit.  In this case, it would mean that those of us who use wheelchairs, whether as residents and employees or as tourists, add much more than we take.

In the meantime, it’s just great to know that we are to blame for all the troubles of the world. 

Annette Bourbonniere

www.accessing-ability.com

401-846-1960

Fax:  401-846-1944

Twitter:  @AccessInclude

Is Walking the Only Goal?

Big news last week.  Austin Whitney walked to receive his diploma at UC Berkley.  http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/05/15/BARO1JFEP8.DTL.

Austin incurred a spinal cord injury in a drunk driving accident just before starting college.  He uses a wheelchair for mobility like so many others.  After working for nine months with the engineering department at Berkley on the exoskeleton that they had been developing for 10 years, he was able to don the nearly full-bodied apparatus pull himself up on a special walker and “walk” across the stage.    This has prompted predictions of the robotic exoskeletons helping hundreds of thousands of wheelchair users to walk. 

Really?

Let’s look at this without the blinders.

People who use wheelchairs can get into the chair and go about their day.  This can include working, studying, driving, playing, taking part in sports, going out to restaurants, and so many other things.  In other words, people who use wheelchairs live life.

Or, we can strap on this apparatus, including a power pack the size of most backpacks, and pull ourselves up on the crutches or walkers that have the controls and take one slow painstaking step at a time.  Even this progress would come after months of training and therapy, all of which would be time taken out of living life.

For those who are convinced that walking – no matter how poor the quality of walking – in the only important thing in life, this may be an answer.  For hundreds of thousands of wheelchair users, I don’t think so.

I congratulate Austin for graduating from college without losing any time.  That is an accomplishment that is noteworthy. 

I also congratulate the engineers at UC Berkley for developing this robotic exoskeleton.  I’m sure that it has many interesting applications.

That said, I need to emphasize that promoting walking over quality of life is not doing persons with disabilities any favors.  Let’s get our priorities straight.

Annette Bourbonniere

www.accessing-ability.com

401-846-1960

Fax:  401-846-1944

Twitter:  @AccessInclude